Tag: stupid

Against Diamonds

Stupid kills. In this case, being uneducated about the various states of carbon

Adding to the pot-stirring that De Beers and others incited, a single page ad appeared in Variety a few months ago, paid for by the Kalahari Bushmen of Botswana, who were driven from their land by the government to make way for diamond mining. Their ad directly addressed DiCaprio, asking for help which then came in the form of several Survival International advocacy efforts.

2008-02-20: Finally a situation where the diamondoid surfaces warning sign makes sense.

Designer Wong makes engagement rings that can kill you. The razor-sharp diamond point is set into the ring so it can’t get knocked out when you smash someone’s face in, and the edges of the ring are really soft so it won’t cut into your skin during the pounding. It’s romantic because it means, “Will you marry me” but it also means, “I can’t always be there to protect you so if some jerk won’t stop bothering you, puncture him with this.” The diamond sharp edge will also cut skin down to the bone (with a minimum 1 karat stone – but the larger the better). Or it may simply be used to tag hard surfaces, like cars and windows for S.O.S. messages or that last will and estimate when pen or paper (or lawyers) aren’t conveniently around.


2008-06-16: Extremely cheap diamonds will hopefully do away with the “diamonds are forever” crap this country’s brides are infatuated with.

“This is a virtual diamond mine. If we were in Africa, we’d have barbed wire, security guards and watch towers. We can’t do that in Massachusetts.”

2008-10-27: Can’t wait for those to be done in volume, and the retarded engagement ring industry to die.

The most exciting aspect of this new annealing process is the unlimited size of the crystals that can be treated. The breakthrough will allow kilocarat diamonds of high optical quality

2012-09-18: That’s a lot of engagement rings. Diamond rings are now even more broadcasting your status as an idiot to the world.

Russia has just declassified news that will shake world gem markets to their core: the discovery of a vast new diamond field containing “trillions of carats,” enough to supply global markets for another 3 ka.

2015-01-07: No more Diamonds, with the exception of the engagement ring nonsense, of course.

Even my own diamond-business owning, non-millennial father is turning away from jewelry when it comes to gift giving. Sure, he’s made my mom a handful of statement pieces over the years, but at the same price point, he’s more likely to gift something that has actual purpose, aside from aesthetic value. The last few birthdays and Christmases have yielded vacation getaways, iPhones of every generation, even a smart home thermostat. What hasn’t shown up under the Christmas tree in the last 5 years? Diamond anything.

2015-03-18: Diamond scams

We were called hip-pocketers, because we lived from one deal to the next: Your business could fit in the wallet in your pocket. You bought a used Rolex at a pawnshop for $1000 from the kid who’s just paid $500 for it, hurried it over to your watch guy to hit it on the wheel and make it look new, replaced the old worn buckle with a South American counterfeit for $50, and resold it to your friend who owned the jewelry store a few blocks over for $2200, $2275 if she wanted a counterfeit leather box. She could retail it the same day for $3500. We “worked the float” back then, in the ’80s and ’90s—that meant the few days you had between when you paid for something with a check and the check actually hit your bank account. If you flipped the gold you’d bought with a check the same day, you had a few days of free money. Of course, you tried to make money on every deal, but often you were moving so fast that you had to lose money here and there, waiting for the bigger score that ought to come if you just kept hustling fast enough.

On the icky details of this criminal hustle

I’ll tell you how it’s done. Let’s say you have a 14-karat gold ring that weighs 15 grams. First you weigh it and show the customer that it’s 15 grams. “Now we multiply that by 14 for 14 karat and divide it by 24 for 24 karat, which is what it would be if it were 100% gold,” you explain to the seller. “That gives us the price for your 14-karat gold. Multiply that by 15, for 15 grams. Now, 14 karat is 56% gold and 44% base metal, which burns off at the smelter, so we multiply that by 0.56. Finally, we deduct 10% for the smelter, and 15% for my profit. Most gold buyers will charge you 20 or 25%, which is a reasonable profit margin, but we do such high quantity of gold-buying here that we can afford very low margins. That gives us a final figure of…” You get the picture. The customer’s ring is worth $280 in real gold value. But you just offered $120, with a seemingly sound mathematical justification. And you’ve left yourself plenty of wiggle room if they want to haggle your profit down from 15% to 10% or even 7.5%. The real key to this scam is that you’ve deducted for the impurity of 14 karat not 1x but 2x: first, when you calculated the per-gram price and again when you “deduct for the base metal.”

2016-06-07: Time for a 1M carat synthetic diamond to end this silliness

Lesedi La Rona could, if skillfully cut, yield an even larger stone—the largest polished diamond in history. He described the Lesedi La Rona, a single piece of rough some 3 ga old, as “almost ungraspable.”

2023-05-06: It’s happening. Too slowly because people are dumb, but still.

33% of all engagement rings with center stones purchased last year were created in a lab. That’s 2x the number from 2020. As the technology to make lab-grown diamonds has improved, production has increased and retail prices are falling. Their growing popularity, especially among younger consumers, has caught the attention of jewelers and watchmakers — and is challenging traditional diamonds that are mined from the earth.

Yahoo

What moron would expire news article URLs when disk space is plentiful and cheap? Apparently Yahoo doesn’t want me to use del.icio.us. The sad thing, just as with their RSS mess, is that they have people working for them who know better. That place needs it’s own mini. Too many clueless middle managers.
2006-09-29: The red tape saga at Yahoo continues.

“NOW let’s just pause for a second.” It is the 4th pause for thought that Terry Semel, chairman and chief executive of Yahoo!, has requested in 10 minutes. He is trying to marshal various arguments to prove that his firm, the world’s largest internet company by visitors to its website, has a coherent and winning strategy compared with Google, a phenomenally successful search engine. With only slightly bigger revenues, Google has 3.5x the market value of Yahoo!. 2x in 3 months Wall Street has dumped the shares of Yahoo! and widened the gap.

2006-10-09: Good article on the many problems at Yahoo.

But the problems at Yahoo go beyond advertising. From video programming to social networking — areas of interest to users and advertisers alike — the company is losing its initiative. And each time a product fails in the market or is late, Yahoo loses some ability to do more deals and hire more talented employees. The shares are down 38% this year, sending some employees out the door in search of better shots at stock market wealth.

2006-10-14: Who indeed

I think the better buyer is a media company. News Corporation is the one that most comes to mind. Rupert has shown that he’s serious about the Internet and that he is not afraid to make big bets. It would be highly dilutive since News Corp itself has a $65B market cap, but it might be accretive to earnings given that News Corp trades at a higher EBITDA multiple than Yahoo! now. The one reason I think its most unlikely is that News Corp has shown an interest in working closely with Google and buying Yahoo! would take them in an opposite direction.

2006-11-23: Heh. Snark at the incompetence manifest in the manifest.

The latest example from Yahoo!, the world’s largest internet company by some measures, reverses the trend. Brad Garlinghouse, a manager just senior enough to be noteworthy, has put forth a “Peanut Butter Manifesto”, which was helpfully “leaked” to the Wall Street Journal. It was meant as part St Crispin’s Day speech to rally the troops, part corporate analysis of Yahoo!’s many troubles, part turnaround plan—and, it seems, part publicity stunt. But it turned out to be a redundant series of platitudes, split infinitives, clichés and mixed metaphors.

2006-12-03: Problems not just with monetization, but basic search, still:

Y! may have 28% of all Internet searches, but for some reason Y! does not generate 28% of Internet traffic.

2006-12-07: Cultural conflict

The story about Braun taking a big corner conference room at Y! HQ and turning it into an office (when even Jerry Yang has a cube out amongst the ‘rank and file’) is a totally rich illustration of SoCal vs NoCal, uh, charm.

2006-12-11: “leaked” like peanut butter?

Facebook flatly rejected the $1B offer, looking for far more. Yahoo was prepared to pay up to $1.62B, but negotiations broke off before the offer could be made.

2007-01-18: Time for Plan B at Yahoo. Funnily self-referential
2007-02-25: +1

At Yahoo, the marketers rule, and at Google the engineers rule. And for that, Yahoo is finally paying the price.

2007-04-19: Nice 1 page summary of an endless list of problems.
2007-06-11: 80 VPs? That’s crazy, and 70 too many.

Yahoo disputes the notion that it is losing people at an unusual rate, saying that it had named 80 vice presidents worldwide this year

2007-07-25: Now there’s a surprise. I am puzzled why good people like Micah Dubinko can stand the nonsense over there.

My time at Yahoo! wasn’t super productive – I had a lot of ideas, but zero ability to get them implemented

2007-09-12: Oy. Talk about a preference for pain.

I’m not going to lie to you, it’s rough going right now. We get smacked around by the media. It’s been a while since we had a really big, notable win. I think morale at the company is low, the future uncertain and the food still sucks (although, I’ve had worse). But despite that, we had a record turnout for our last internal hack day. We had so many people with ideas that we had to completely change the format of the event because the campus could no longer scale to meet our demands. There is still plenty fight in this company and we have no shortage of asses to kick. So lace up all you Yahoo!’s…the ass won’t kick itself.

2007-10-03: 50? Try 500. No wonder they can’t get anything done.

People at Yahoo figure out the average number of employees per VP. The number seems to be around 50.

2007-10-06: Could be worth as much $45 per share with a dramatic overhaul that would include outsourcing its paid search, cutting staff by 25% and restructuring its graphic display advertising.
2007-11-30: I especially liked the one about the 300 VPs.

2007-12-11: Traffic down

web search queries on Yahoo! were down 10% from November 2006

2008-02-01: Comarketing

Think about it… Yahoo doesn’t mean keyboards. They didn’t do plastics or ergonomic research or think of some insight about key travel distance. The message was that Yahoo was willing to put their name on anything.

2008-02-15: I think its related to education levels. Dumb people can’t tell if they are getting crap results.

Yahoo is strong in “struggling societies,” “blue collar backbone,” and “remote America,” where as Google obtains higher use in “small town contentment,” “affluent suburbia,” and “upscale America.”

2008-04-21: Simple features take 2 years to launch indeed.
2008-07-01: Can I haz flickr / del.icio.us?

Microsoft is trying to put together a sort of take-over coalition where Microsoft would get Yahoo’s search while AOL or News Corp would acquire other parts of Yahoo. However, it doesn’t seem all that likely.

landing pages that aren’t

if you want to capture the attention of web innovators, you might want to start with an accessible site. when i see sites like this or this, i hit the back button. so does google.

looks like it’s not only clueless startups. bmw germany uses inaccessible javascript navigation, and in an effort to ‘fix’ their resulting crap google ranking, used doorway pages, which resulted in the google death penalty. right on.

Blogger blight

Terry Frazier:

I was at the first AC conference in 2003. I attended on a lark and had a great time. I went again to AC2004, and again had a very good experience. But I’ll miss the conference this year, and I wonder – can the close-knit, community atmosphere of the past 2 years survive the arrival of the traveling Techno-Circus?

so will i. accelerating change 2003 was the best conference i have ever been to. a program that took no prisoners attracted a most excellent crowd. where else can you have discussions with people from the immortality institute? and now, for some unknown reason, the conference has sold out to speakers that have nothing to do with accelerating change. who cares about blogging, or even worse, podcasting? now we get “tutorials”, pitches about investing, and the admission price has increased.