The Project
AdvoKit is a VoterID/GOTV Web application being developed as free software / open source. AdvoKit combines support for the best practices of traditional
VoterID/GOTV campaigning with the power of social networks and friend-to-friend methodology. Current proprietary systems cost upwards of 100k for use by a state campaign. This is a very high barrier to entry for
smaller organizations.
To see a background white paper on the project, check out this PDF
The Community
Several people who have been involved in the Howard Dean and Dennis Kucinich campaigns are nurturing this effort. The team is involved in mature discussions with a variety of potential users (local and state organizations) as well as the leading national organizations who could deliver training and hosting for users of Advokit.
Funding
The project has received a very high degree of interest from several organizations and adequate funding for a small team of developers will be in place very quickly.
The Technical Lead
The team is looking for a person who has coordinated volunteers and maintained a free software or open source package. The ideal person would have experience with web application and database development.
Contact
For more information on this project, please contact Henri Poole
Tag: opensource
joint copyright assignment
Many open source projects, including the Free Software Foundation, Red Hat and OpenOffice.org require that contributors assign their copyright when they contribute code. Sun, the NetBeans project sponsor, has come up with an innovative Joint Copyright Assignment (“JCA”) that allows contributors to retain their own copyright while sharing a joint copyright interest in the contributed code. This way contributors retain all the rights granted by copyright law while sharing those rights with the open source project sponsor so that the code is protected by both the Sun Public License (“SPL”) and copyright law.
interesting option. we are trying it out with the xaraya project.
Open source trafficking
i just got this from the sourceforge site update email newsletter:
SourceForge.net is now ranked #258 (out of 100K) in the world in terms of sheer traffic. To put this fact in some perspective, during the past 12 months, SourceForge.net has surpassed IBM.com, Sun.com, and Cnet.com in daily page views. A graph from Alexa can be viewed here. The blue line, representing SourceForge.net, is the one to focus on.
wow.
ASL 2.0 article
my asl 2.0 article is now in print. they wanted a silly picture with tie to go with it, but i’d rather have no picture than a bland one. gotta take charge of your identity.
Fostering the provision of public goods
Let’s say for instance, that Xaraya attracted 5 more non-profit organizations to the development group. They would then be in a collective of IT development for a single purpose. Are there costs involved? Absolutely, but when you compare the costs to hiring an IT staff of 40 to 50 with a range of experience from management, database design, server management, etc.., it makes sense in the long run.
john muses on what would happen if xaraya were able to gain the support of additional non-profits. i think the time is right to actively work towards this scenario. the tools are ready, and the developers can be had at a discount currently. it is highly motivational and piques my curiosity to see the ideas in Free Provision of Complex Public Goods being implemented. who knew that i would see the application of highly theoretical work i pored over for my thesis in my lifetime 😉
when free beats for pay
dave is ranting about how free software cannot be user-oriented. i bought a license of manila, and tried radio for a while. verdict: Movable Type has a better user interface than both userland products, and costs.. $0
Getting it done
i have observed different projects and their inability to get a release out. the strive for perfection is one easy culprit. ever a man of advice, doug has this to say:
apakuni: too bad they do not think like mothers
apakuni: after 9 months of gestation, they want their babies out
gregorrothfuss: LOL
gregorrothfuss: good point
apakuni: we need to engineer a DNA modification that equates to labor in software devs
gregorrothfuss: lol
apakuni: a) water breaks (release .9.9.8)
gregorrothfuss: LOL you are too funny tonight
gregorrothfuss: are you inebriated?
apakuni: b) labor (release .9.9.9)
apakuni: c) birth (release 1.0.0)
apakuni: nope .. i am at work
The spirits I called
Someone built the system, they assumed certain user behaviors. The users came on and exhibited different behaviors. And the people running the system discovered to their horror that the technological and social issues could not in fact be decoupled.
This strikes home with my experience helping to build different tools over the years.
I finally got around to read shirkys longish essay about groups being their worst enemy. There is too much good material in the piece to give it justice with commentary, so I will just quote interesting paragraphs instead.
People who work on social software are closer in spirit to economists and political scientists than they are to people making compilers. They both look like programming, but when you’re dealing with groups of people as one of your run-time phenomena, that is an incredibly different practice.
It’s very difficult to coordinate a conference call, because people can’t see one another, which makes it hard to manage the interrupt logic. In Joi’s conference call, the interrupt logic got moved to the chat room. People would type “Hand,” and the moderator of the conference call will then type “You’re speaking next,” in the chat. So the conference call flowed incredibly smoothly.
1.) If you were going to build a piece of social software to support large and long-lived groups, what would you design for? The first thing you would design for is handles the user can invest in. 2.) Second, you have to design a way for there to be members in good standing. Have to design some way in which good works get recognized. 3.) You need barriers to participation. This is one of the things that killed Usenet. You have to have some cost to either join or participate, if not at the lowest level, then at higher levels. There needs to be some kind of segmentation of capabilities. 4.) And, finally, you have to find a way to spare the group from scale. Scale alone kills conversations, because conversations require dense 2-way conversations. In conversational contexts, Metcalfe’s law is a drag.
consulting times on oss dev
Open Source development provides us with a way to use our existing talents and skills while increasing our productivity. Many people with whom I work consider this development model as mainstream. I experienced personal growth as a result of my involvement with Open Source projects and find it as acceptable at a cocktail part as working as an auditor for a major accounting firm.
eep. i am not sure auditing is all that accepted, but then again i am trying to unlearn my 5 years of KPMG 🙂 good intro article though.
open source branding
I’m not suggesting the monster gets replaced with some prick with a laptop looking serious while rubbing his chin as his foxy secretary takes notes in their walnut and leather office – but something a little more businessy wouldn’t hurt.
+1