As 1 consultant finished listing some of his Fortune 100 clients, I said, That’s nice, but what’s your Google number? Puzzled looks soon overcame everyone in the room. Google number? What’s that? I quickly explained that it was a rough-order measure of your reputation and influence as a thought-leader – it is how much buzz, or word-of-mouth, you have as an expert.
If your Google Number is around …
100 or less – keep your day job and start publishing
400 – do a nice web site and publish more
800 – it is probably safe to hang out your shingle
1000 – you are getting some real attention
2000 – you are well known in your field
5000 – you are an often quoted expert in your field – a thought-leader
This post is for my parents.
Over the years, as they have seen me grow up, branch out, move out, move away, they have repeatedly asked what it is that i do. And my erstwhile answer, writing software, is ever more inaccurate. Yes, i do write software, but i do so much more, too.
I have always been an avid reader, I love to communicate new ideas, I cheerlead things that are below the radar. At the same time, I am much more interested to start than to finish. I love the first 20%, I loathe the last 20%. I am impatient, restless, driven.
I am passionate about knowledge, networks. I freelygive away. I drink from the fire hose.
Serendipity is my drug, tunnel vision my kryptonite. I seek out the big ideas in every field that will reveal its treasures to my inquiries. I synthesize, recombine, mutate. infect.
As the ideaspace and the meatspace overlap in curious and intertwingled ways, as the virtual engulfs the real, I break open the floodgates for abundance where scarcity and drought prevailed.
I peddle in stigmergy, gfn, emergence, memetics, acceleration, bootstrapping, osmosis, power laws.
I am a trader in ideas.
i had an awesome time in new york over the weekend after our sushi event on friday night. the cast: paul ford writer, XML & semantic web hacker michael wechner physicist, OSCOM founder, entrepreneur, XML geek michael m. wechsler lawyer with coding fu. scares the hell out of me. operates a community law site. p2p law? sarah m. byers boston-based maker of trouble and film producer susan “sooz” kaup event organizer (geekpride 2000 etc), reed’s law embodiment chalu kim zope hacker, entrepreneur, artist paul taggart freelance photographer joshua darden wunderkind typographer a trip report is available.
who invited chris pirillo to keynote at apachecon? the first 21 minutes, he talked about himself, and finally reached his premise after 37 minutes even though it was immediately apparent. give me a break. UPDATE heh, i should have worded this more carefully, and not blog immediately.. i very much agreed with the premise of the talk, it is the delivery (given the techie audience) that made me unhappy. no hard feelings, chris. coffee sounds good. UPDATE 2 in the meantime, we talked, and i directed chris to somecool RSS applications. curiously, our little thingie got covered in the seattle pi.
While extinction has been the fate of many creative entrepreneurs of the late 60s and 70s and 80s, why has the INTERCONTINENTAL FOREIGN LANGUAGE PROGRAM – whose symbol is the living Phoenix bird, so familiar to people on the street through millions of language fliers over the years – flourished? In part, the answer lies in the way its founder, director, and principal instructor, Lee Riethmiller, honed his fluency in the 26 languages he currently speaks. Riethmiller’s unique septalingual course (where students learn to speak 7 languages simultaneously) drew interest from The Christian Science Monitor, The Brookline Tab, US Magazine, CBS Television, and National Public Radio.
carl made me aware of this guy. i would love to go to a class, just to see how the system works. and picking up 7 new languages, why not 🙂 my list would be:
chinese (mandarin)
spanish
japanese
portuguese
sanskrit
russian
arabic
we’ll get perfect translation via AI before we get this sort of hyperfluency (16 languages!) from a large part of society.
12 years on, Fedorenko is confident of certain findings. All her subjects show less brain activity when working in their mother tongue; they don’t have to sweat it. As the language in the tests grows more challenging, it elicits more neural activity, until it becomes gibberish, at which point it elicits less—the brain seems to give up, quite sensibly, when a task is futile. Hyperpolyglots, too, work harder in an unfamiliar tongue. But their “harder” is relaxed compared with the efforts of average people. Their advantage seems to be not capacity but efficiency. No matter how difficult the task, they use a smaller area of their brain in processing language—less tissue, less energy.
All Fedorenko’s guinea pigs, including me, also took a daunting nonverbal memory test: squares on a grid flash on and off as you frantically try to recall their location. This trial engages a neural network separate from the language cortex—the executive-function system. “Its role is to support general fluid intelligence”. What kind of boost might it give to, say, a language prodigy? “People claim that language learning makes you smarter,” she replied. “Sadly, we don’t have evidence for it. But, if you play an unfamiliar language to ‘normal’ people, their executive-function systems don’t show much response. Those of polyglots do. Perhaps they’re striving to grasp a linguistic signal.” Or perhaps that’s where their genie resides.
Barring an infusion of Valproate, most of us will never acquire Rojas-Berscia’s 28 languages.
I am writing to find out something from you. I have my sister who lives in Boston right now, and having a really TOUGH time finding employment. What are the opportunities like? I used to live in Boston, actually, I attended Suffolk, and I can’t believe that she can’t find anything. How about your company, do you think you can work some magic?
i’m getting solicitations from strangers on ryze now.
i had a demo with webx yesterday to an audience that was 5000 km away. it was quite weird to talk to an audience i could not see. not being able to parse facial expressions meant i had no clue whether my demo was going anywhere.
My dad is sending me pieces of his biography by email as he writes them up. He never told me the full story of his life, so I am very intrigued to learn about it while I am 16000 km away. This means a lot to me.