Tag: internet

Battling Internet Censorship

The battle won’t be won until these legacy industries are destroyed.

There’s a lot of understandable enthusiasm about today’s array of anti-SOPA (Stop Online Piracy Act), anti-PIPA (Protect IP Act) demonstrations and protests.

But there’s a real risk as well. When the big home page banners come down, and the site “blackouts” are lifted, the urge for the vast majority of Internet users to return to “business as usual” will be very strong.

Perhaps you’ve signed an online petition or tried to call your Congressman or Senator today, and you’ve probably already heard that DNS blocking provisions (at least for the moment, pending “further study”) were announced as being pulled from SOPA and PIPA several days ago.

So you might be tempted to assume that the battle is over, the war is won, and that — as Maxwell Smart used to say — “Once again the forces of niceness and goodness have triumphed over the forces of evil and rottenness.”

Nothing could be further from the truth.

In fact, the forces arrayed in favor of Internet censorship are not only powerful and well funded, but are in this game for the very long haul indeed. A day of demonstrations to them, as annoying as they may be to these censorship proponents in the very short run, are in the final analysis more like a single human lifetime compared against the centuries.

PIPA is coming up for an important vote shortly, and word is that SOPA will likely reemerge (with its horrific search engine censorship provisions intact) next month.

Even if there are further delays and changes, it is inconceivable that pro-censorship forces, given the depths of their economic beliefs and disdain for Internet free speech, will ever give up.

Like zombies rising repeatedly in an old horror movie, they will keep pouring money into Congress and be continually working on strategies to remake the Internet in their own images.

This may involve SOPA and PIPA. It will likely also involve new legislation down the line that hasn’t even yet been introduced, some standalone, some possibly buried in other bills. Censorship arguments will expand to include law enforcement wish lists, “protect the children” arguments, and every other pro-censorship stakeholder wish list that you can imagine.

The battle against Internet censorship is literally a war without end. Pro-censorship alliances will shift and change over time, the names of involved legislation may be different, but the overall thrust will stay essentially the same, and the trend will always be toward more censorship, not less.

All of this is true even if we ignore the possibility of a horrific triggering event like a terrorist attack that enables vast new knee-jerk civil liberties crackdowns.

We must be prepared to battle censorship on the Internet as a matter of our everyday lives. That means a continual presence in Washington and other capitals around the world, not just collectively but in terms of constant long-term campaigns of individually written letters and direct phone calls to our own elected officials — both among the most effective techniques — short of suitcases full of cash. Educational campaigns explaining why the battles against Internet censorship are so crucial must continue on our sites, and in our other personal and professional communications as well, every single day.

We cannot be complacent. These efforts to preserve free speech on the Net can never end, or we will all lose one of the Internet’s most important wonders, and our civil rights — both off and on the Internet — will be snuffed out like a candle in the darkness, with only a waft of digital smoke left behind as a memory of what might have been.

Today’s anti-censorship demonstrations were but the first sounding of the bugle, the first loud call to arms.

The war to protect free speech and fight censorship on the Internet is guaranteed to long outlive us all.

Buttcoin Will Fail

Because of hoarding, essentially.

TL:DR; the current banking industry and late-period capitalism may suck, but replacing it with Bitcoin would be like swapping out a hangnail for Fournier’s gangrene. tax evasion, crazy gini coefficient, mining has a CO2 footprint from hell, etc

2014-02-09: While the ship has sailed for buttcoins, all these new cryptocurrencies give the permanently deluded another chance to dust off their “rigs”.

With the rise of ASIC mining, we’ve been deprived lately of hilariously awful mining rigs.

2014-02-25: I don’t have to watch any telenovelas, i’m getting all the drama / lulz from the buttcoin saga. The best part is the (failed) plan to bail them out because “too big to fail”
2014-06-13: This seems bad

The GHash mining pool just reached 51% of total network mining power. Bitcoin is no longer decentralized. GHash can control Bitcoin transactions.

2016-01-14: Where is your god now, buttcoiners? A true believer rethinks his life.

But despite knowing that Bitcoin could fail all along, the now inescapable conclusion that it has failed still saddens me greatly. The fundamentals are broken and whatever happens to the price in the short term, the long term trend should probably be downwards. I will no longer be taking part in Bitcoin development and have sold all my coins.

2021-01-12: Haven’t made fun of buttcoin in a while, time to fix that:

A hedge fund! If you’re a person who bought some Bitcoins and lost the password then, oops, that’s tough for you, and we’ll all have a laugh about it. But if you are a professional investing firm who bought some Bitcoins with your investors’ money and held them as a fiduciary for those investors, and then lost the password, then you probably can’t be a professional investing firm anymore. That’s not good.

And yet it is in a way understandable. If you are a hedge fund and you buy some stock, you will not spend even a moment worrying about losing the stock. That is an entirely solved problem in 21st-century finance. You will have a custodian who holds the stock for you, but it’s not like the custodian is keeping stock certificates in a vault that might burn down. The custodian has an account with the Depository Trust Company, the stock is all on computers (like a blockchain!), there are a lot of backups and redundancies, and in practice stock does not just go missing. We talk occasionally about weird anomalies in this system, places where the system briefly loses track of where some bits of stock are supposed to be, but they are all temporary and marginal. Nobody misplaces billions of $ of stock forever. Nobody misplaces 20% of all the stocks in the world forever, come on

2021-11-18: Avery Pennarun looks at this again, 10 years later:

10 years(!) have passed since I wrote Why bitcoin will fail. And yet, here we are, still talking about bitcoin. Did it fail? Here are some reasons I missed for why bitcoin (and blockchains generally) didn’t and still don’t work, for anything productive:

  • Scams. Lots and lots of scams. Blockchains became the center of gravity of almost all scams on the Internet. I don’t know what kind of achievement that is, exactly, but it’s sure something.
  • Citizens moving money out of authoritarian regimes. This is, by definition, illegal, but is it a net benefit to society? I don’t know. Maybe sometimes.
  • Other kinds of organized crime and trafficking. I don’t know what fraction of money laundering nowadays goes through blockchains. Maybe it’s still a small percentage. But it seems to be a growing percentage.
  • More and more blockchains. There are so many of them now (see “scams”, above), claiming to do all sorts of things. None of them do. But somehow even bitcoin is still alive, even though a whole ecosystem of derivative junk has sprouted trying to compete with it.
  • Corrupt or collapsed exchanges. I predicted technical problems, but most of the failures we’ve seen have been simple, old fashioned grifters and incompetents. Indeed, the failures of this new financial system are just like the historical failures of old financial systems, albeit with faster iterations. Some people are excited about how much faster we can make more expensive mistakes now. I’m not so sure.
  • Gambling and speculation. I wrote the whole article expecting bitcoin to fail at being a currency, but that charade ended almost immediately. What exists now is an expensive, power-hungry, distributed, online gambling system. The house still always wins, but it’s not totally clear who the house is, which is how the house likes it. Gambling has always been fundamentally a drain on society, a tax on the uneducated,, but it’s always very popular anyway. Bitcoin is casino chips. Casino chips aren’t currency, but they don’t “fail” either.

2022-01-23: And here’s Moxie’s take.

Given the history of why web1 became web2, what seems strange to me about web3 is that technologies like ethereum have been built with many of the same implicit trappings as web1. To make these technologies usable, the space is consolidating around… platforms. Again. People who will run servers for you, and iterate on the new functionality that emerges. Infura, OpenSea, Coinbase, Etherscan. Likewise, the web3 protocols are slow to evolve. When building First Derivative, it would have been great to price minting derivatives as a percentage of the underlying value. That data isn’t on chain, but it’s in an API that OpenSea will give you. People are excited about NFT royalties for the way that can benefit creators, but royalties aren’t specified in ERC-721, and it’s too late to change it, so OpenSea has its own way of configuring royalties that exists in web2 space. Iterating quickly on centralized platforms is already outpacing the distributed protocols and consolidating control into platforms.

Secure Firewall

For best effect install the firewall between the CPU unit and the wall outlet. Place the jaws of the firewall across the power cord, and bear down firmly. Be sure to wear rubber gloves while installing the firewall or assign the task to a junior system manager. If the firewall is installed properly, all the lights on the CPU will turn dark and the fans will grow quiet. This indicates that the system has entered a secure state

OnLive

a couple days ago OnLive announced a price drop for CES – $66 for the system, plus a free game. I couldn’t resist any more. For the price of a new XBox game, I could get a whole new gaming system which my brain still says should be impossible. Bargain! Despite the fact that I already have an XBox and a Wii, and barely any free time to play either of them, I handed over my credit card info and got the system in yesterday. It’s amazing. The system itself isn’t much bigger than a Roku box or an Apple TV box (though heavier). I mean, it’s *tiny*. OnLive need to put pics of the box next to some pencils or something on their website, because even though I saw its size compared to the controller, I just mentally enlarged it to the size of an XBox or PS3. It’s half the size of a Wii, if not tinier.

a streaming game console.

Tunisian harvesting

The Tunisian Internet Agency is being blamed for the presence of injected JavaScript that captures usernames and passwords. The code has been discovered on login pages for Gmail, Yahoo, and Facebook, and is the reason for the recent rash of account hijackings reported by Tunisian protesters.

When states act like rogues, whom can you trust?