Tag: economics

Farm Subsidies

Shining light on the biggest waste of taxpayer money ever.
2007-04-04: In celebration of the new annotated Google Maps, I have created 2 maps that show your taxes at work:

Top EU CAP farm subsidy in the UK: $700 millionTop USDA farm subsidy in the US: $541 million

The top recipient of EU CAP farm subsidies in the UK got $700M, the top recipient of USDA farm subsidies in the US got $541M.

2007-08-28: Nice complement to my pork mapshop maps.
2007-11-08: This is why I make farm subsidy maps 🙂

eliminating farm subsidies in the first world and liberalizing trade would produce annual benefits of $2.4t, with 50% of that accruing to the third world.

2008-06-10: Nice! They now have their own maps, starting with Sweden. Fight the pork.

€100B subsidy transparency

wow

the biggest release of information held by governments to the public and the media since the creation of the European Union. All 27 EU countries will disclose data revealing details of some €100bn given in subsidies by the Eurotaxpayer every year to farmers, food companies, industrial regeneration schemes and the fishing industry, from the Black Sea resorts in Bulgaria and Romania to the Canary Islands and Madeira.

Vaccine Commitments

The commitment made yesterday by rich countries to buy a suitable vaccine, meeting internationally recognized standards for efficacy and safety, could transform the economics of development of new vaccines. Pause briefly on how radical this policy is. There is a social need for extra R&D and investment in production facilities. But instead of paying researchers to do that research – which might or might not succeed, they are creating market incentives and allowing competition to do the rest. The donors create a reward for the private sector – the prospect of a lucrative market for vaccines – which enables firms to invest in developing and producing the needed vaccines. But if the research fails it will cost the donors nothing. The taxpayer will only have to cough up if the vaccines are actually developed and used. And if the vaccine is used, it will save more than 5m lives over the next 25 years – at $300 per life saved, a bargain in development terms. For firms, this is attractive because it creates a whole new market for their products, and enables them to serve poor country markets on a commercial basis, rather than as an act of corporate social responsibility. And for developing countries, they have the prospect of access to new vaccines, which in the past have taken 15-20 years to be mass produced cheaply enough for them to be widely used in developing countries. So this is an results-based, market-oriented, hard-headed partnership between donors, developing countries and the pharmaceutical industry which, if it works, will solve one of the most important health challenges on the planet.