Researchers have produced a ground-breaking new material, graphane, which has been derived from graphene. What is huge: 1. Graphene has already has a lot of great properties. Strongest material. Very conductive. 2. Now graphene can be chemically modified to tune the properties even more. Making something highly conductive and highly insulating means all kinds of electrical devices are possible 3. This is opening the door to even more chemical modification. 4. Graphene has already been turned into proof of concept liquid crystal display devices (single pixel) and quantum dots and transistors
Materials science rarely gets the respect it deserves. We really should all bow before these people. They make modern civilization. 2013-03-25: Graphene is nearly here.
A 10000 Farad Supercapacitor is powerful enough to power a Semi Truck while being the size of a paperback novel. Tesla promised to get the price of lithium batteries down to $150 / kWh by 2020, our current cost estimated for this type of graphene based supercapacitor is about $100 / kWh today and we should be able to cut this pricing in half by the end of 2015
2013-07-16: Graphene is one of my bets for most impactful technology of the 21th century.
A new form of Carbon : Grossly warped ‘nanographene’ : The new material consists of multiple identical pieces of “grossly warped graphene,” each containing exactly 80 carbon atoms joined together in a network of 26 rings, with 30 hydrogen atoms decorating the rim. Because they measure slightly more than a nanometer across, these individual molecules are referred to generically as “nanocarbons.”
Odd-membered-ring defects such as these not only distort the sheets of atoms away from planarity, they also alter the physical, optical, and electronic properties of the material.
2015-02-27: A kind of moore’s law for graphene. If you can convince enough of the industry that the roadmap is real, it becomes real due to all the investment it triggers
In an open-access paper published today in the Royal Society of Chemistry journal Nanoscale, more than 60 academics and industrialists lay out a science and technology roadmap for graphene, related 2-dimensional crystals, other 2d materials, and hybrid systems based on a combination of different 2d crystals and other nanomaterials.
The roadmap covers the next 10 years and beyond, intended to guide the research community and industry toward the development of products based on graphene and related materials.
The new roll-to-roll manufacturing process described by his team addresses the fact that for many proposed applications of graphene and other 2-D materials to be practical, “you’re going to need to make km2 of it, repeatedly and in a cost-effective manner.”
50cm / min is starting to get interesting. 2016-01-07:
Researchers found a way to incorporate carbon nanotubes and graphene into spider silk. “We measure a fracture strength up to 5.4 GPa, a Young’s modulus up to 47.8 GPa and a toughness modulus up to 2.1 GPa. This is the highest toughness modulus for a fiber, surpassing synthetic polymeric high performance fibres (e.g. Kelvar49) and even the current toughest knotted fibers.”
The use of graphene as an additive can give mechanical and electrical benefits to composite materials, making them multifunctional. In a novel fermentation method, Graphene Flagship researchers have developed graphene-containing rubber foams with unusual mechanical and electrical behaviors: when stretched, the composite foams expand and become more conductive. These unexpected properties could be promising for use in smart filters and medical devices.
Alliance Rubber intends to help determine exactly how this super-material could be used in its products. The partnership will explore potential uses for graphene-infused rubber bands for many other characteristics.
Graphene-rubber bands could act as bar codes for produce in grocery stores
Heat-sensitive bands which change color depending on the temperature.
Graphene and carbon nanotubes are undoubtedly the materials of the future. In their perfect form they are the strongest materials that are known to exist, with thermal conductivity among the highest of known materials, and even superconducting electrical properties. However, defects in the lattice structure cause significant decreases in these physical properties; and so quality and purity are of paramount importance. On top of this it is very difficult to make continuous sheets more than a couple of millimeters long, and even harder to wrangle this atomically thin layer into real-world applications. We recommend paying attention to companies that are developing methods to produce graphene and CNTs in larger sizes and for lower costs. And we will be tracking companies that show themselves to be successful at leveraging today’s low-quality graphene flakes to improve existing products, or to develop new capabilities for applying this material in novel ways.
An allotrope is a substance with a defined structure that’s made up of only one element, but differs from another form of the same pure element. Graphite (familiar as pencil “lead”) is a famous allotrope of carbon, and it has the same infinite-stacked-sheets-of-atoms structure. Single isolated sheets, known as graphene, were (famously) isolated a few years ago, and these single-atom-thick are different enough that most people consider them a different allotrope than even graphite, which name is used for the bulk material. So what if you took a structure like graphene, the flat sheet of 6-membered rings, and made a flat sheet of buckyballs instead? That has now been prepared and named “graphullerene”.
Stanford researchers have found a way to use silicon nanowires to reinvent the rechargeable lithium-ion batteries that power laptops, iPods, video cameras, cell phones, and countless other devices. The new technology produces 10x the amount of electricity of existing lithium-ion batteries. A laptop that now runs on battery for 2 hours could operate for 20 hours
2011-08-16: The progress in battery energy density has been very slow. 2019-04-25: 1000 Wh / kg? Though see their roadmap from a few years later that is more like 300 Wh / kg.
Innolith have the world’s first 1000 Wh/kg rechargeable battery. This would 3x the range of electric cars. The Innolith Energy Battery would radically reduce costs by not using exotic and expensive materials.
In a paper published in Nature in February, Chueh and his colleagues described an experiment in which an AI was able to discover the optimal method for 10-minute fast-charging a lithium-ion battery. Finding optimalsolutions in a hugesearchspace is exactly the type of problem AI was built to solve. But until recently, battery-building AIs were hampered by a lack of data. “Historically, battery data has been very difficult to acquire because it’s not shared between researchers and companies”
While structural batteries for vehicles are highly rigid, the cell developed by Kotov’s team is meant to be pliable to cope with the movements of the robots. They’re also incredibly energy-dense. As Kotov and his team detailed in a paper published earlier this year, their structural batteries have 72 times the energy capacity of a conventional lithium-ion cell of the same volume. For now, their batteries are being used to power robotic toys and small drones as a proof of concept. He expects they’ll be used in midsize robots as well as larger hobby drones in the not-so-distant future. “Drones and medium-size robots need to have new solutions for energy storage. I can guarantee you that structural batteries will be a part of that.”
On a longer time horizon, we consider Lithium-oxygen batteries an intriguing possibility. This class of battery derives energy by oxidizing pure lithium metal with a source of oxygen, traditionally in the form of ambient air. Reacting pure lithium with ambient oxygen can result in an electrochemical cell with the highest possible energy density of any metal, yielding theoretical capacities of 11k Wh/kg (not counting the weight of the reacted oxygen). This is noteworthy when Li-ion is today topping out at 250 Wh/kg, and Li-metal will theoretically top out around 3k Wh/kg. And especially interesting when you consider that liquid gasoline has a maximum energy density of 13k Wh/kg, with only 1.7k Wh/kg delivered to the wheels after losses. But a lithium-air battery in this basic configuration is not rechargeable. And significant technological challenges remain before any appreciable cycle-life is expected from batteries built with this technology. These lithium-air or lithium-oxygen batteries are at least 5–10 years away from commercialization, but could disrupt the market with a 10x step-change in energy density, rivaling liquid gasoline in terms of raw energy density.
2023-03-12: Li-S battery startup. Zeta’s cathode is based on a sulfurized carbon material that offers high stability and superior sulfur content, outperforming current metal-based cathode materials. Their sulfur-based cathodes are inherently inexpensive, have effective cost-per-energy use no cobalt and have 0 dependency on precious metal cost volatility or foreign nations.
2C02 + 2e- + H20 -> C2O3H2 + O2 the product is a simple sugar that could be used in a variety of ways, and the removal of C02 from the atmosphere would be great for countering global warming.
If you seeded the algae with iron dust, you could radically accelerate the rate at which it consumed CO2. The money quote: “Give me a half tanker of iron, and I will give you an ice age.”
2011-01-23: Genocide carbon capture. The mongol conquest killed 40m people and reabsorbed 700m tons of CO2 due to reforestation. 2012-10-24: CO2 negative fuels. What Iron fertilization does for geoengineering the oceans, this contributes to carbon sequestration on land, with the following claims:
1% of planetary landmass to drive all cars
2% to bring net CO2 emission to 0 by 2030
bring 100M people out of extreme poverty
The crucial difference, this proposal makes revenues instead of the $30B / year the iron fertilization would cost.
2013-05-10: Geoengineering is no longer a theory, for better or worse.
In a large ocean eddy west of Haida Gwaii the project has replenished vital ocean mineral micronutrients, with the expectation and hope it would restore 10K square kilometers of ocean pasture to health. Indeed this has occurred and the waters of the Haida eddy have turned from clear blue and sparse of life into a verdant emerald sea lush with the growth of a 100M tons of plankton and the entire food chain it supports. The growth of those tons of plankton derives from vast amounts of CO2 now diverted from becoming deadly ocean acid and instead made that same CO2 become ocean life itself.
2014-07-10: The first planet we’ll terraform will be our own.
Once you know what plankton can do, you’ll understand why fertilizing the ocean with iron is not such a crazy idea
2014-10-09: Greening deserts are very bad for the oceans 2014-12-13: For Geoengineering
it’s not perfect and there are some things it won’t do. Turning down the sun does nothing for ocean acidification. But it looks like it can cut 80% of the total variation in climate, which is really stunning.
the deserts are becoming more green and are producing less dust. This is driving the steady reduction of iron into the oceans by ~1% per year. 42% more CO2 in the atmosphere means that plants in the desert need to breathe less and keep more water. Less dust from the desert means less iron into the ocean. Iron shortage in the ocean is the key factor that is reducing algae and plankton in the ocean.
Engineers have designed enzyme-functionalized micromotors the size of red blood cells that rapidly zoom around in water, remove CO2, and convert it into a usable solid form. The proof-of-concept study represents a promising route to mitigate the buildup of carbon dioxide
2017-08-01: 9% Ocean kelp farm. Now that’s geoengineering:
There is a proposal to use 9% of the ocean’s surface for massive kelp farms. The Ocean surface area is 360m km2. This would offset all CO2 production and provide 0.5 kg of fish and sea vegetables per person per day for 10b people as an “incidental” by-product. 9% of the world’s oceans would be equivalent to 4.5x the area of Australia.
These methods will be faster to scale than complicated and industrial intensive carbon capture at coal and natural gas plants and factories and creating massive national and global pipelines to move the captured gas into underground storage.
Suberin has a lot of unique properties that could make it useful for storing CO2 from the atmosphere. It’s primarily composed of CO2 and it’s not biodegradable, which means it will last a few 1000 years. You need 5% of the world’s farmland growing highly-enriched suberin crops to fix 50% of all the CO2 that we’re putting up there.
The great Azolla boom was so successful that it lasted for 800k years, and is now known to paleobotanists as the “Azolla event.” Green plants suck up carbon dioxide; Azolla is particularly good at doing so. Over that period, it sequestered 10t tons of CO2 from the Earth’s atmosphere, or 200x the total amount of CO2 humans currently release into the atmosphere every year. The plant’s shape contains specialized little indents where it houses cyanobacteria, a form of blue-green algae that acts as a nitrogen fixer—that is, converting nitrogen in the atmosphere into a fertilizer. The fern hosts the bacteria, providing it with sugary fuel, and in doing so, helps make its own fertilizer.
Right now, the Salk team is at the beginning phases of this project. They’ve identified genetic pathways that control for the 3 traits they want to bring out in plants: increasing suberin, enlarging root systems, and making the roots grow down deeper into the ground. Now they will begin to test combining those 3 traits in a model plant called arabidopsis in the lab, before moving on to crop plants like corn, soybean and rice. They hope to have prototypes of souped up versions of major crops within 5 years, and are already in talks with agricultural companies to partner on testing them.
Scientists propose a framework for modifying AC units to suck in CO2 and spit out fuels for use in vehicles like cargo ships.
2019-05-02: What would it look like if a small group of billionaires took unilateral climate action through solar radiation management?
The Triumvirate, as the 3 billionaires came to be known, was used to having the world’s attention. 1 of them had led the charge to colonize Mars, landing 2 probes on the Red Planet and, almost as a sideshow, a crew on the moon in 2026. Another had cleverly engineered his way around the slowing of Moore’s law, and by 2029 owned 60% of the world’s server space. The 3rd had started with a social media platform before selling high and expanding into cars in the Philippines and Indonesia, simplified mobile payment systems in Africa, and other projects. Their extra-boardroom activities, alternately adulated and mocked across the world’s Twitter feeds, ranged from the absurdly dangerous (BASE jumping off an erupting volcano) to the simply absurd (Periscoped comparisons of McDonald’s fries in 63 countries).
From the time of the industrial revolution, humanity has generated 2.3t tons of CO2 and we now have 1t tons more CO2 in the atmosphere than there was around 1800. Where did the other 1.3t tons of CO2 go? 50% was absorbed into the soil and plant mass and 50% went into the ocean. Our CO2 problem would be 2x as bad if not for the soil, trees and ocean. By doubling the existing CO2 absorption process of the soil, plants and ocean we can offset the excess CO2 and other gases. This is not just the 50b ton per year amount generated by the vehicles, buildings and factories but the whole 1t tons.
Integrating SRM and other geoengineering methods under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) regime can make those methods legitimate objects of global climate governance. The UNFCCC could also facilitate trust-building and surveillance measures to lessen the concern that a handful of the largest and richest countries might seize the reins of planetary modification. The convention and its associated regime would offer a framework for “climate-bargaining” between countries with the means and will to undertake geoengineering measures and those that lack sufficient resources or prove reluctant to undertake such activities. The UNFCCC and other institutions, such as the World Meteorological Organization, should play an important role in sharing information and best practices, serving as international clearinghouses for SRM and other geoengineering research. Project funders and national research organizations can also play an integral role by incentivizing adherence to codes of conduct for responsible SRM research.
Although solar geoengineering is typically conceived of as centralized and state-deployed, we explore highly decentralized solar geoengineering. Done perhaps through numerous small high-altitude balloons, it could be provided by nonstate actors such as environmentally motivated nongovernmental organizations or individuals. Conceivably tolerated or even covertly sponsored by states, highly decentralized solar geoengineering could move presumed action from the state arena to that of direct intervention by nonstate actors, which could in turn, disrupt international politics and pose novel challenges for technology and environmental policy. We conclude that this method appears technically possible, economically feasible, and potentially politically disruptive.
Today, after a rigorous search and review by a panel of independent scientific experts, we’re excited to announce our first purchases. Our request for projects garnered a wide range of negative emissions technologies which came in 2 broad categories.
2020-11-26: Lanternfish are the largest animal migration in the world, and removes 50% as much CO2 from the atmosphere as humanity emits from the burning of fossil fuels.
2020-11-27: Stripe is buying carbon removal to bring it down the cost curve. It needs to get at least 3x cheaper to scale. 2021-01-19: A snapshot of developments in carbon removal, with the typical NYT hand wringing and concern trolling thrown in:
“It’s a chicken-or-egg problem. The best way to bring down the cost is to start deploying these technologies at scale. But until there are actual customers, no one’s going to build them.”
To help break the impasse, Stripe announced in 2019 that it would begin spending at least $1M annually on carbon removal, without worrying about the price per ton initially. The goal was to evaluate companies working on promising technologies and offer them a reliable stream of income.
Over the last 20 years, supported by an army of volunteers, the project team has sown nearly 75M seeds. Around 36 km2 of coastal bays are now blanketed with eelgrass, which has improved water quality, increased marine biodiversity and helped mitigate climate change by capturing and storing CO2. Despite covering less than 0.2% of the ocean, it is responsible for 10% of the ocean’s ability to store CO2. It provides a vital habitat for marine life, boosts commercial fishing, helps purify water, protects coastlines and even traps and stores microplastics.
A new generation of soil studies powered by modern microscopes and imaging technologies has revealed that whatever humus is, it is not the long-lasting substance scientists believed it to be. Even the largest, most complex molecules can be quickly devoured by soil’s abundant and voracious microbes. The magic molecule you can just stick in the soil and expect to stay there may not exist. “Now it’s really clear that soil organic matter is just this loose assemblage of plant matter in varying degrees of degradation.” Some will then be respired into the atmosphere as CO2. What remains could be eaten by another microbe — and a third, and so on. Or it could bind to a bit of clay or get trapped inside a soil aggregate: a porous clump of particles that, from a microbe’s point of view, could be as large as a city and as impenetrable as a fortress. Studies of carbon isotopes have shown that a lot of carbon can stick around in soil for centuries or even longer. If humus isn’t doing the stabilizing, perhaps minerals and aggregates are.
Getting from 4000 tons a year to 5b tons quickly enough to help limit climate change may seem fanciful but there is an intriguing comparison with the world’s first commercial wind farm, which opened in 1980 on Crotched Mountain in New Hampshire. That project consisted of 20 turbines with a combined output of 600 kW. In 2020, the wind capacity installed around the world was 1.23m times larger, at 740 gigawatts. Increasing Orca’s annual output at the same rate would yield a CO2 removal capacity of 5b tons by around 2060. “That is exactly what climate science asks us to do to achieve climate targets”. The challenge will hinge on reducing costs, which are now $600-$800 per ton. Increased output could bring those costs down to $200-$300 per ton by 2030, and $100-$150 somewhere around 2035. DAC would already be competitive if it received the subsidies that helped electric vehicles and solar panels deploy and flourish. A fundamental difference from wind and solar power is that they were ultimately driven by the profit motive because once subsidies had helped to make them competitive they were producing a valuable asset: cheap electricity.
The growing resources available to support carbon capture technologies along with domestic and foreign policy changes and increasing levels of public support make it likely that we will see significant commercialization of carbon capture technologies in the next 10 years. Carbon capture technologies fill 1 of 2 roles: 1) reducing CO2 emissions from industrial processes, making them more carbon neutral, or 2) removing CO2 from the air, acting as a negative emissions technology (NET).
Large projects (>1 million tonnes of CO2 per year) that reduce emissions by capturing CO2 from industrial sources and non-utility power plants will be a steady but slow area of growth, given long project timelines and the large quantities of capital required (>$500m). With only the existing US tax credits to incentivize carbon capture, such projects will be led by large corporate entities (likely oil & gas majors), rather than electric power utilities or midsize companies.
At a carbon tax level of $50–60 per metric tonne of CO2, removing CO2 from the emissions of large industrial facilities could be cost-neutral with today’s technologies. Liquid amine scrubbing technologies will likely remain the technology of choice for CO2 capture from large industrial sources, unless there is significant process innovation around solid adsorbents or membranes. Svante, a leader in carbon capture process innovation, is a possible disrupter, and research continues into fluidized beds and other types of processes that could make CO2 capture with solid materials more cost effective for gases with high CO2 contents (5–30% CO2).
The cost of directly capturing CO2 from air has the potential to fall significantly due to innovations in solid materials for CO2 capture, material heating and cooling strategies, and optimization of carbonation technologies. This field is currently led by new companies rather than large established ones: specifically Climeworks and Carbon Engineering are currently deploying carbon capture plants. Business model innovation may enable “crowdsourcing” or corporate funding of capturing CO2 directly from the air if capture costs can be reduced to $100 per metric tonne or less. In all cases, the ability to site carbon capture systems near pipelines, storage sites or other CO2 users is critical.
If small scale CO2 capture plus utilization or chemical conversion technologies mature, CO2-to-products plays at smaller scales of 10k–100k metric tonnes of CO2 per year could become an area of rapid growth. These technologies require either very low capture costs ($40/tonne or less), or the ability to use non-pure CO2.
The ocean currently soaks up 30-40% of all humanity’s annual carbon emissions, and maintains a constant free exchange with the air. Suck the carbon out of the seawater, and it’ll suck more out of the air to re-balance the concentrations. Best of all, the concentration of carbon dioxide in seawater is 100x greater than in air.
Previous research teams have managed to release CO2 from seawater and capture it, but their methods have required expensive membranes and a constant supply of chemicals to keep the reactions going. MIT’s team, on the other hand, has announced the successful testing of a system that uses neither, and requires vastly less energy than air capture methods.
The team projects an optimized cost around US$56 per ton of CO2 captured – although it’s not fair to compare that directly against full-system direct air capture costs. The study cautions that this does not include vacuum degassing, filtration and “auxiliary costs outside of the electrochemical system” – analyses of which will have to be done separately. Some of these, however, could potentially be mitigated by integrating the carbon capture units in with other facilities, for example desalination plants, which are already processing large volumes of seawater.
2023-03-23: Another approach that can work with seawater
CO2 is relatively diluted in the atmosphere at 400 ppm. So big machines that require large amounts of energy are needed to both absorb and discharge the CO2. This new approach, using off-the-shelf resins and other chemicals, promises far greater efficiency and lower cost. The new hybrid absorbing material was able to take in 3x as much CO2 as existing substances. “To my knowledge, there is no absorbing material which even at 100k ppm, shows the capacity we get it in direct air capture of 400 ppm”. This new approach can remove CO2 for less than $100 a ton. With the addition of some chemicals the captured CO2 can be transformed into bicarbonate of soda and stored simply and safely in sea water.
What would it take to start making a serious dent in atmospheric CO₂? Say we shot for 80 gigatons of olivine a year, locking away 100 gigatons of the stuff when fully weathered. Unlike many proposals for carbon sequestration, olivine intervention is not contingent on undiscovered or nascent technology. Let’s take a look at the process through the lens of an increasingly small grain of rock.
Once a suitable olivine formation has been located, quarrying rock out of the formation is cheap. Even in high-income countries like Australia or Canada where mine workers make top-notch salaries, the cost of quarrying rock and crushing it down to gravel size is $3 / ton, and it requires very little energy. Since reversing global warming would entail the biggest quarrying operation in history, we might well expect costs to drop further.
Depending on the deposit, haul trucks might prove unnecessary; it may be most cost-effective to have the crusher and mills follow the front lines. The wonderful thing about paying people to mill rocks is that we don’t have to know for sure from our armchair; the engineers tasked with keeping expenses to a minimum will figure it out as they go.
What is quite certain is that the vast majority of that expense, both financially and in terms of energy, comes not from mining or crushing but from milling the crushed rock down to particle size.
Though there’s no way to know for sure until and unless the sequestration industry reaches maturity, a reasonable upper estimate for capital investment is $1.60 per ton of CO₂ sequestered, giving a total cost per sequestered ton of $9. The resulting bill of $900b per year might sound gargantuan – but it’s worth remembering that the world economy is a $100t / year behemoth, and each ton of carbon dioxide not sequestered is 20x as costly.
2023-06-19: For scale, you want a liquid process, not gas or solid.
Demand for direct air capture depends on government policy, “green” hydrogen prices, the success of point source capture, and the acceptance of more creative sequestration technologies. Government policy might encourage DAC with subsidies or by taxing carbon. The cheaper green hydrogen is, the more competitive chemicals will be. Point source capture is a direct substitute for DAC in providing chemical feedstock and sequestration if it becomes easier to permit wells. Potentially cheaper interventions like mineral weathering can replace carbon sequestration but aren’t acceptable chemical feedstock.
The carbon capture method depends heavily on project needs. Burying carbon is method-agnostic, while feedstocks need a certain quality and quantity. Solid sorbents will likely rule for small-scale applications, but traditional methods using big pipes and fans get more competitive as demand increases. Energy availability is also an influence. “Baseload” sources favor traditional methods, while solar PV works better with solid sorbent systems that can concentrate energy use during peak daylight hours.
Cheaper carbon capture encourages government policy and industrial adoption. $1000/ton is a non-starter. Chemicals become competitive at $50-$100/ton while capture and sequestration become cheaper than the cost of pollution. These prices are achievable, and climate change will be just another scare solved by human ingenuity.
Because the earth’s crust is thinner than usual along the rift, it has vast geothermal potential. The American government reckons Kenya alone could generate 10gw of geothermal power, 10x the amount it currently produces. A by-product of such power stations is plenty of waste steam, which can then be used to heat dac machines. Moreover, since close to 90% of Kenya’s power is renewable, the electricity these machines consume does not contribute to more global warming.
Capturing CO2 is just part of the process. Next it has to be safely locked away. The rift’s geology is particularly good for this, too. It has bands of porous basalt (a volcanic rock) that stretch across 1000s of km2. This makes the region “ideal” for carbon capture and storage. After CO2 has been sucked from the air it is dissolved in water (in the same way one would make sparkling water). This slightly acidic and bubbly liquid is then injected into the rock. There it reacts with the basalt to form carbon-rich minerals—in essence, rocks—which means the gas will not leak back into the atmosphere.
Regulations imposed in 2020 by the United Nations’s International Maritime Organization (IMO) have cut ships’ sulfur pollution by 80% and improved air quality worldwide. The reduction has also lessened the effect of sulfate particles in seeding and brightening the distinctive low-lying, reflective clouds that follow in the wake of ships and help cool the planet. By dramatically reducing the number of ship tracks, the planet has warmed up faster. That trend is magnified in the Atlantic, where maritime traffic is particularly dense. In the shipping corridors, the increased light represents a 50% boost to the warming effect of human carbon emissions. It’s as if the world suddenly lost the cooling effect from a fairly large volcanic eruption each year.
Gelli baff turns bath time into playtime! Simply run your bath 5 cm deep, add gelli baff to and watch in amazement as your boring bath water magically turns into a fun, thick goo.
the heaviest element possible, without violating relativity. any element with an atomic number of greater than 138 would require 1s electrons to be traveling faster than c, and as such would not have stable electron orbitals.
Unlike other solid-to-liquid-fuel processes such as cornstarch into ethanol, this one will accept almost any carbon-based feedstock. If a 80 kg man fell into one end, he would come out the other end as 17 kg of oil, 3 kg of gas, and 3 kg of minerals, as well as 56 kg of sterilized water. While no one plans to put people into a thermal depolymerization machine, an intimate human creation could become a prime feedstock. “There is no reason why we can’t turn sewage, including human excrement, into a glorious oil”.
Just as we are hitting the hubbert peak, we get a technology that may make oil rigs obsolete:
Andreassen and others anticipate that a large chunk of the world’s agricultural, industrial, and municipal waste may someday go into thermal depolymerization machines scattered all over the globe. If the process works as well as its creators claim, not only would most toxic waste problems become history, so would imported oil. Just converting all the US agricultural waste into oil and gas would yield the energy equivalent of 4B barrels of oil annually. In 2001 the United States imported 4.2B barrels of oil. “This technology offers a beginning of a way away from this.”
With their main (only?) source of income in danger, what will the middle east kleptocracies do?
because
The only thing this process can’t handle is nuclear waste. If it contains carbon, we can do it.” and Thermal depolymerization has proved to be 85% energy efficient for complex feedstocks, and even higher for relatively dry raw materials, such as plastics
Held together by a slowly rotating system of currents northeast of Hawaii, the Eastern Garbage Patch is more than just a few floating plastic bottles washed out to sea; the Patch is a giant mass of trash-laden water 2x the size of Texas.
Declaring war on the “white pollution” choking its cities, farms and waterways, China is banning free plastic shopping bags and calling for a return to the cloth bags of old
2013-12-05: Depolymerization was hailed as the solution ~10 years ago: turning plastic back into more versatile compounds. I weirdly haven’t heard much about it since. Probably because no one cares about trash?
almost every facility like it in the country is running in the red. More than 2K municipalities are paying to dispose of their recyclables instead of the other way around.
Anything that requires constant vigilance (sorting) combined with subsidies isn’t going to work even medium-term. looks like recycling needs a big reboot. 2017-04-26: Plastic-eating worms. This sounds like one of those “obvious solutions”, like releasing rabbits in Australia to deal with a forgotten problem. Fear our future where the wax worm is up there with rust as a mortal enemy of civilization.
While other organisms can take weeks or months to break down even the smallest amount of plastic, the wax worm can get through more—in a far shorter period of time. The researchers let 100 wax worms chow down on a plastic grocery bag, and after just 12 hours they’d eaten 4% of the bag. That may not sound like much, but that’s a vast improvement over fungi, which weren’t able to break down a noticeable amount of polyethylene after 6 months.
Hydrothermal liquefaction could change the world’s polyolefin waste, a form of plastic, into useful products, such as clean fuels and other items. Once the plastic is converted into naphtha, it can be used as a feedstock for other chemicals or further separated into specialty solvents or other products. There is 1B tons of polyolefin waste in landfills.
2019-03-13: Plastic recycling never worked, and was a greenwashing effort by the industry, and dum-dums fell for it.
Even before China’s ban, only 9% of discarded plastic was being recycled, while 12% was burned. The rest was buried in landfills or simply dumped and left to wash into rivers and oceans. Without China to process plastic bottles, packaging, and food containers—not to mention industrial and other plastic waste—the already massive waste problem posed by our throwaway culture will be exacerbated, experts say. The planet’s load of nearly indestructible plastics—more than 8B tons have been produced worldwide over the past 60 years—continues to grow.
Companies like ExxonMobil, Shell, and Saudi Aramco are ramping up output of plastic to hedge against the possibility that a serious global response to climate change might reduce demand for their fuels. Petrochemicals now account for 14% of oil use, and are expected to drive 50% of oil demand growth between now and 2050. The World Economic Forum predicts plastic production will double in the next 20 years.
Every human on Earth is ingesting 2000 particles of plastic a week
2020-04-11: 90% breakdown of PET in under 10 hours. Process is still expensive and needs to scale further. 2020-07-08: Apples are the most contaminated fruit while carrots are the vegetables most affected. This is a much bigger problem than the performative efforts to clean up the great pacific garbage patch.
THROW A POLYESTER sweater in the washing machine and it’ll come out nice and clean, but also not quite its whole self. As it rinses, millions of synthetic fibers will shake loose and wash out with the waste water, which then flows to a treatment plant. Each year, a single facility might pump 21B of these microfibers out to sea, where they swirl in currents, settle in sediments, and end up as fish food, with untold ecological consequences.
The company plans to use what it learns from the demonstration facility to build its first industrial plant, which will house a reactor 20x larger than the demonstration reactor. That full-scale plant will be built near a plastic manufacturer somewhere in Europe or the US, and should be operational by 2025. Manufacturing PET from enzymatic recycling could reduce greenhouse gas emissions between 17% and 43% compared to making virgin PET.
Last month, a group of marine biologists noticed something fishy in a video by a nonprofit called The Ocean Cleanup. “This is likely a staged video. I call bullshit.” In the 25-second clip, a large net appears to dump 4000 kg of plastic waste, including crates, buckets, and fishing gear, onto the deck of a ship. The Ocean Cleanup, which has raised more than $100m on the promise to rid plastic from the seas, said the trash in the video was just pulled from the Great Pacific Garbage Patch. “It’s like mopping up the spill when the spigot is still on. We can’t clean up our way out of plastic pollution.”
Gregor J. Rothfuss 