Month: January 2012

Home Ownership is a fraud

270m Americans are already renters or neo-feudal peasants “bound to the land” by mortgage and consumer debt and the tax code

ignoring the talk about getting rid of the fed, very much agreed with getting rid of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, HUD, and the FHA. they support a harmful fetish and prevent savings from going into more productive areas of the economy.

Film School Fraud

Is The New York Film Academy Worth The Money? i have long suspected that film school is an expensive way to unemployment, but these tales take the cake.

Furthermore, the locations your students most often ask me about tend to be notoriously expensive and difficult to shoot in: doctor’s offices, jail cells, luxury apartments, high-end restaurants, etc. That students aren’t being warned off writing scripts around such high-priced filming locations they have no prior access to is really, really strange.
I have to shoot my thesis and I’m facing a lot of problems regarding my locations: my story in fact takes place during World War II, and I need 4 peculiar interiors: a bedroom, a living room and a kitchen that can be believable for that time. In order to make my life easier, I also need a jail, ‘40′s-looking as well.
The bottom line, as I’ve written to your students time and again: outside of public streets and parks, THERE ARE NO FREE LOCATIONS IN NEW YORK CITY.
I am doing the 8 week filmmaking program…I came across your site and read your post about 5 Beekman…Being a student, the problem is that my budget is next to non-existent. Is there any possibility that we could get this location next week?

Battling Internet Censorship

The battle won’t be won until these legacy industries are destroyed.

There’s a lot of understandable enthusiasm about today’s array of anti-SOPA (Stop Online Piracy Act), anti-PIPA (Protect IP Act) demonstrations and protests.

But there’s a real risk as well. When the big home page banners come down, and the site “blackouts” are lifted, the urge for the vast majority of Internet users to return to “business as usual” will be very strong.

Perhaps you’ve signed an online petition or tried to call your Congressman or Senator today, and you’ve probably already heard that DNS blocking provisions (at least for the moment, pending “further study”) were announced as being pulled from SOPA and PIPA several days ago.

So you might be tempted to assume that the battle is over, the war is won, and that — as Maxwell Smart used to say — “Once again the forces of niceness and goodness have triumphed over the forces of evil and rottenness.”

Nothing could be further from the truth.

In fact, the forces arrayed in favor of Internet censorship are not only powerful and well funded, but are in this game for the very long haul indeed. A day of demonstrations to them, as annoying as they may be to these censorship proponents in the very short run, are in the final analysis more like a single human lifetime compared against the centuries.

PIPA is coming up for an important vote shortly, and word is that SOPA will likely reemerge (with its horrific search engine censorship provisions intact) next month.

Even if there are further delays and changes, it is inconceivable that pro-censorship forces, given the depths of their economic beliefs and disdain for Internet free speech, will ever give up.

Like zombies rising repeatedly in an old horror movie, they will keep pouring money into Congress and be continually working on strategies to remake the Internet in their own images.

This may involve SOPA and PIPA. It will likely also involve new legislation down the line that hasn’t even yet been introduced, some standalone, some possibly buried in other bills. Censorship arguments will expand to include law enforcement wish lists, “protect the children” arguments, and every other pro-censorship stakeholder wish list that you can imagine.

The battle against Internet censorship is literally a war without end. Pro-censorship alliances will shift and change over time, the names of involved legislation may be different, but the overall thrust will stay essentially the same, and the trend will always be toward more censorship, not less.

All of this is true even if we ignore the possibility of a horrific triggering event like a terrorist attack that enables vast new knee-jerk civil liberties crackdowns.

We must be prepared to battle censorship on the Internet as a matter of our everyday lives. That means a continual presence in Washington and other capitals around the world, not just collectively but in terms of constant long-term campaigns of individually written letters and direct phone calls to our own elected officials — both among the most effective techniques — short of suitcases full of cash. Educational campaigns explaining why the battles against Internet censorship are so crucial must continue on our sites, and in our other personal and professional communications as well, every single day.

We cannot be complacent. These efforts to preserve free speech on the Net can never end, or we will all lose one of the Internet’s most important wonders, and our civil rights — both off and on the Internet — will be snuffed out like a candle in the darkness, with only a waft of digital smoke left behind as a memory of what might have been.

Today’s anti-censorship demonstrations were but the first sounding of the bugle, the first loud call to arms.

The war to protect free speech and fight censorship on the Internet is guaranteed to long outlive us all.

Future of identity

Identity is central in human activities. Having a functioning psychological and social identity is essential for wellbeing. Threats to identity are serious threats and often evoke strong reactions. Yet we have multiple, changing identities.
Online identities will be growing rapidly in importance and will raise a plethora of issues. Linking multiple identities to a legal identity and across time and domains can cause problems, in the form of breaches of privacy, risks of identity theft, damage to reputations, and reprisals.
Virtual worlds – be they online games, social spaces or teleconferencing, will grow in reach and use. Users feel strongly about their online identities and want control over them despite weak legal protections.
The augmented world and exoselves: In the words of one author, the generation growing up now will “never be alone, never lost, never forget” – the constant connectivity holds together social networks regardless of location, location services makes everything findable, and life recording allows the storage of representations of a large part of life. The resulting extended memory is likely to have significant effects on personal identity.
Identity technology: Not only humans but objects are gaining persistent, traceable identities. RFID-tags and other methods will give many objects a much richer identity, allowing them to be identified not just as belonging to a category but also as individual objects, possibly without direct touch.
Automation and robotics will have broad but diffuse impacts on various aspects of identity, mainly by gradually changing the nature of work and impacting labour markets.
Medicine and personalized health are not only about health but also about the expression of social identities. Eating healthy and exercising – or not – are choices that people make not only because of health effects but also to maintain a certain social identity. Diagnostic medicine (and genomics) will expand the medicalization of self-conception.
Genomics raises many important identity-related issues. Some of the main issues include: (1) changes in self-conception as a result of knowledge about the personal genome and how it correlates with life outcomes; (2) general changes in conceptions of human nature and human identity as a result of better understanding genetic causation; (3) the possibility that genomics will reveal significant differences between ethnic groups – this could have important implications for ethnic identity;
(4) genetic privacy will become increasingly hard to safeguard, thanks to cheaper gene sequencing and methods such as PCR amplification that allow even a small sample (such as a skin flake or a hair follicle) to produce enough genetic information.
The medicalization of conception, embryo selection, and (over time) genetic modification will have important effects on individuals – most obviously on individuals who would not have come into existence were it not for these procedures, but also on parents whose reproductive lifespan is extended, and eventually on wider society.
Drug-use will continue to be a significant identity-related issue, and it may be joined by new concerns over novel pharmaceutical neuroagents.
A long lived, multigenerational society: Longer lifespans will lead to changes in how people regard their identity as aged people, as well as increased diversity in how age-related aspects of identity are managed and in cultural expectations.
New technologies may accentuate the vulnerability of certain groups: people who are outside identity systems, people who need certain forms of privacy, people unable to handle the growing complexity of identity, people who are victims of identity theft, and people with persistently ruined reputations. Developing methods for identity rehabilitation might be important in order to reduce the risk for vulnerable groups.