I just hope that these are typos, otherwise it would certainly look like really weird XML. If they are typos, I wonder how many there are in the spec? Surely the guys at Ecma had enough time to review this? Why am I now suppose to act as a junior sub editor? I would understand if it was a missing quote or full-stop here or there. But 3 quite major glitches within consecutive 3 lines? Thats quite scary.

VML the undead, and the depths of ms office xml

• Uncategorized