Things that would be easy if the software were designed by Google or Yahoo isn’t so easy.
time for a play?
Sapere Aude
Month: April 2007
Things that would be easy if the software were designed by Google or Yahoo isn’t so easy.
time for a play?
While XHTML2 is a semantic improvement over XHTML 1.0, it does not seem likely that it will matter for web developers for a long time, especially when one considers that Internet Explorer still doesn’t offer XHTML 1.0 support. It will take many years for a new version that might support XHTML2—and we have been given no indication that the next one will. On the other hand, many parts of HTML5 are already creeping into browsers, and, if Microsoft takes an active part in the development of HTML5 in the future, it looks likely that many features that are already very polished will be supported cross-browser in a much shorter timeframe. The fact that HTML5 contains several areas that are already ready for implementation while still being developed in other areas makes it a technology that is easy to partially adapt until browser support is fully evolved for the features you wish to use.
good explanation of xhtml5 vs xhtml2 , etc
A way of controlling the user experience from within the code — for example, by being able to choose whether popups appear in a tour, how fast such a tour should run, and whether a tour should start automatically. I’d also love to have better time-line functionality (along these lines), and the ability to subscribe to GeoRSS and WMS from within KML network links.
some nice ideas
stare at it long enough and it spins in the opposite direction
the US military issuing a press release about a religious service in which “the Spirit of God moves in and grips men and women in such a way that suddenly the community becomes God-conscious.”

heh. that’s what photo on maps is for
cute. after yahoo, ms is cloning bigtable too
The U.N. is actually recommending that adult males in Africa be circumcised, and New York City is considering the same. This is astonishing, not only because it is wacky science, but because it is the quintessential 3000 years-old example of wacky science.
i bet the us mullahs are behind this nonsense
A science is emerging that combines a new understanding of how humans work to usher in a new generation of machines that mimic or aid human physical and mental capabilities. Some 150M of us are over the age of 80, while 200M of us suffer from severe cognitive, emotional, sensory, or physical disabilities. Giving all or even most of this population a quality of life beyond mere survival is both the scientific challenge of the epoch and the basis for a coming revolution over what it means to be human. To unleash this next stage in human development, our bodies will change, our minds will change, and our identities will change. The age of Human 2.0 is here.
in typical media lab fashion, a bit over the top. but remarkable nonetheless. a couple years ago they would have been laughed off the stage
more algorithmic trading. it is quite irritating that in 2007 they still need to write articles that explain that “a computer can execute a trade much faster than a human” oy